Video Storage Cost Reduction Solutions

Help video storage achieve dramatic cost reduction through object storage and hybrid cloud approaches

Core Pain Points of Video Storage

Traditional Solution Defects

• Linear storage architecture causes read/write speeds to decline as capacity increases
• Original videos occupy space, cold data long-term occupation of high-performance storage
• Single replica storage + periodic backup mechanism
• Storage expansion requires downtime maintenance, lacks intelligent management tools

Business Impact

• Key frame retrieval delays exceed 5 seconds, emergency response efficiency reduced by 30%
• Storage costs increase 47% annually, 80% storage resources occupied by low-frequency access videos
• Hardware failures lead to 72-hour data recovery cycles, risk of critical evidence loss
• Manual operations cost $3.2/TB/month, system availability below 99%

Five Core Cost Reduction Capabilities

Storage Cost Direct Reduction 68%

• Original video frame-level compression algorithm (VFC-3 patent technology)
• Intelligent hot-cold separation: automatically identify videos not accessed for 30 days and transfer to glacier storage
• Support EB-level storage expansion, single TB cost as low as $0.015/month

Minute-Level Data Access

• Global deployment of 128 edge nodes, transmission speed improved 5x
• Support 2000+ device concurrent writing, read/write latency less than 300ms
• Intelligent preloading technology: high-frequency access videos automatically cached to edge nodes

Military-Grade Data Protection

• Three-replica storage + remote disaster recovery (compliant with ISO27001/Level 3 Security)
• Blockchain evidence storage: key videos generate timestamp hashes, judicial-level trusted evidence
• Version rollback: video recovery at any time point within 120 days

Zero-Modification Access

• Compatible with 14 protocols including ONVIF/RTSP/GB28181
• Provides SDK/API/RESTful three access methods
• One-click migration tool for existing data (supports NAS/SAN/Ceph)

Intelligent Operations Dashboard

• Real-time monitoring of storage health, cost distribution, access hotspots
• Capacity prediction algorithm: 3-day advance warning of storage bottlenecks
• Automatically generate monthly optimization recommendation reports

Solutions

Frontend monitoring videos can be uploaded to cloud through three methods

Hybrid Cloud Tiered Storage

Applicable scenarios: Large parks, smart cities (1000+ cameras)

Core Capabilities

• Intelligent tiering: hot data stored locally on SSD (response <100ms), full data automatically synced to cloud
• Direct cost reduction: cloud storage cost $0.021/GB-month, bandwidth usage reduced 80%
• Seamless disaster recovery: real-time active-active between local and cloud data

Direct Cloud Storage

Applicable scenarios: Shops, communities, homes (50-200 cameras)

Core Advantages

• 5-minute ultra-simple deployment: scan-to-use, automatically adapts H.265 compression
• Intelligent management: motion detection automatically generates 30-second event clips
• Zero maintenance: fully managed cloud storage, data durability 99.9999999%

Server Relay Storage

Applicable scenarios: Educational parks, cross-regional enterprises

Key Technologies

• Edge preprocessing: video frame extraction analysis (saves 90% traffic)
• Intelligent routing: automatically switches TCP/UDP protocols to ensure transmission
• Tiered archiving: original videos stored 30 days, low-bitrate copies stored 180 days

Why Choose Us

Controllable Costs

EB-level elastic expansion, cold data storage cost as low as $0.015/GB·month

Ultra-Fast Response

Global 128 edge nodes, video transmission speed improved 5x

Automatic Video Upload Encryption

Automatic video encryption ensures upload storage security, prevents data leakage and illegal distribution, while helping platforms meet privacy protection regulations and reduce legal risks

Version Protection

Platform-provided original video automatic encryption service effectively prevents piracy and tampering, protects intellectual property, while improving user trust and satisfaction

Technical Parameter Comparison Table